Looking at Barrett’s history and how the teardown of this story happened, it’s very difficult to argue otherwise. However, according to their editor’s note, they regret that decision and that it reflects “poor judgment” on their part. The Atlantic, for their part, was aware of this and wanted to give Barrett a second chance. Barrett is the married name of Ruth Shalit, a well-known journalist who, in the 1990s, faced multiple allegations of journalistic malpractice including plagiarism and fabrication. Barrett may not turn many heads, her full name, Ruth Shalit Barrett, may well. However, that deception should not have come as a surprise. Replaced by just an editor’s note and a PDF version of the original piece, the magazine has acknowledged multiple factual errors in the work and they further claim that they were “deceived” by the article’s author. Unfortunately for The Atlantic, they have been forced to retract the article. It told tales of gruesome injuries at youth events, parents spending extravagant amounts of money on coaching their children and even building “Olympic-size hockey rinks” for their kids. Barrett” with the headline “The Mad, Mad World of Niche Sports Among Ivy League–Obsessed Parents”Ĭlocking in at approximately 6,500 words, the piece was ultra-wealthy parents and their efforts to get their children on Ivy League teams for niche sports such as fencing, squash and lacrosse. ![]() In the November 2020 edition of The Atlantic, the magazine published an article by “Ruth S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |